StudyJesus.com presents The Sermon on the Mount
An Expositional Study
BAD AND GOOD CRITICISM
Navigation: Index >> Previous >> Next
JUDGE NOT, THAT YE BE NOT JUDGED. FOR WITH WHAT JUDGMENT YE JUDGE, YE SHALL BE JUDGED: AND WITH WHAT MEASURE YE METE, IT SHALL BE MEASURED TO YOU AGAIN. AND WHY BEHOLDEST THOU THE MOTE THAT IS IN THY BROTHER'S EYE, BUT CONSIDEREST NOT THE BEAM THAT IS IN THINE OWN EYE? OR HOW WILT THOU SAY TO THY BROTHER, LET ME PULL OUT THE MOTE OUT OF THINE EYE; AND, BEHOLD, A BEAM IS IN THINE OWN EYE? THOU HYPOCRITE, FIRST CAST OUT THE BEAM OUT OF THINE OWN EYE; AND THEN SHALT THOU SEE CLEARLY TO CAST OUT THE MOTE OUT OF THY BROTHER'S EYE. GIVE NOT THAT WHICH IS HOLY UNTO THE DOGS, NEITHER CAST YE YOUR PEARLS BEFORE SWINE, LEST THEY TRAMPLE THEM UNDER THEIR FEET, AND TURN AGAIN AND REND YOU.
A first reading of this passage gives one
the impression that it is against criticism of people; one is inclined to title
it, "Stop Criticizing," as Moffatt's translation of Romans 14:13, "Let us stop criticizing one
another." And that would certainly
be a theme worth covering; for, sad to say, this is a sin that seems to be
rampant among us today. We can better
understand people of the world who are away from Jesus Christ living selfish
lives, criticizing one another, backbiting, and slandering. But for this to be
pursued by some Christians is both a shock and tragedy. However, that is only a third part of the
Master's teaching in this part of our study—a more careful examination reveals
that here we have three kinds of criticism—one deprecated, two commended. First,
We
are to eschew spiteful criticism
"Judge not." Is this an absolute prohibition? There are some who go as far as to say that
this verse prevents a Christian from being on a jury; but surely the inspired
words of the apostle Peter gives us a contrary impression, "Submit yourselves
to . . . the king . . . or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him
for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well"
(1
Do
not judge
For many reasons we are warned against
indulging in this practice. We probably
are unaware of all the facts. Before we
allow ourselves to be "down on" someone's behavior, are we sure that
we are cognizant of, and have assessed the strength of, his temptations,
heredity, and environment? Perhaps we
were not brought up in a drunkard's home, a gambler's home, an unclean home: so we would not know much about it. While we loathe the sin with all our outraged
indignation we must see that we do not criticize the poor sinner but
sympathize—with a real sympathy that cares enough to actually try and help him.
There is almost always "another side" to everything: even that tale
we may hear that seems so circumstantial will probably have another side, and
will be capable of a different interpretation when we know. So let us not hastily make up our minds when
we hear rumors. Let us never make up our
minds until we have heard both sides.
By
the grace of God
Let us never forget that in like
circumstances we might possibly be as bad. If we call ourselves "Christian;" if we experience any degree
of victory over sin; if we have attained any measure of holiness of life, it is
all of God's grace. A spiritually wise
Christian once saw a convict chained to a warden crossing a street. He was
heard to say, "There but for the grace of God goes this old
preacher." He felt that if it had
not been for that, he might have been, not a greatly loved, grand old preacher,
but perhaps a prisoner. How Paul would have applauded that sentiment—"now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed" (Gal.
1:23). His testimony would be
that except for the grace of God he would have continued to be a persecutor and
not a preacher. We cannot recall a
single sentence throughout the whole of his utterances or letters in which he
uses one word of complaint against his own persecutors: he never forgot that if
God's grace had not laid hold of him he would have remained one. Such a thought should help guard us against
criticism of others.
It
all comes back
Another point is that we will certainly
find it recoiling on our own heads. Criticism is a bludgeon: it is also a boomerang; it has a nasty habit of
coming back and hurting the person who throws it at others. The Master here says, "with what
judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall
be measured to you again." This may
mean that we will “be judged” by God based on our behavior to others. Already in this Sermon He has enunciated it
as a law of the kingdom. That in certain
ways He does “measure” His attitude to us in accordance with the measure of our
treatment of others—"If ye forgive men . . . your heavenly Father
will . . . forgive you . . . but if . .
. not"—no. (5:14-15). However, the point here is probably this: mutual reciprocity in
judgment should be expected from others. They will be prone to pay us back in like manner. In other words, he who
spitefully criticizes others will be mercilessly criticized. Consider Ishmael in Genesis 16:12, whose
"hand [was] against every man" (emphasis added), with the inevitable
consequence, "every man's hand against him." Consider Adoni-bezek in Judges 1:6-7, whose enemies "cut off his thumbs and his great
toes." Why? Because, on his own
confession he had treated seventy other kings in exactly the same way. Consider Haman in
Ester 7:10, "they hanged Haman on the gallows
that he had prepared for Mordecai." Criticism is a firm believer in
reprisals. We should beware of and avoid
criticism.
Judgment
of man—fallible.
In addition: at best, we are fallible in
our judgment. Knowing all the facts, two
people can easily draw different conclusions; each convinced the other is
wrong. Even though we think our judgment
right, seeing that others have an opposite opinion based on exactly the same
facts, it is not only fair and wise, but Christian to extend the benefit of
doubt and at all cost refrain from criticism.
Quenching
the spirit
A more serious consideration is: we are in
grave danger of quenching the Spirit. In
our personal life, few things so quickly tend to hold up the working of the
Holy Spirit as the presence of the critical spirit in man. Much harm has been done to the Lord's work
when this evil thing has manifested itself. There are congregations of the Lord's church whose spirit has been
poisoned, influence ruined, blessing arrested, and the Master dishonored—simply
because of criticism. Yes, this vile
thing called criticism hurts everyone. Because of its widespread use among Christians, it has on occasion
greatly damaged and effected the Lord's people and
their work for Him.
We
are told not to criticize
When all is said and done, these arguments
are subsidiary: if they did not exist, it would still be wrong for anyone to
criticize. But for Christians, the
all-sufficient reason is: we are told not to do it. That should be enough. It is disloyal to disobey—“judge not.” The form of Greek used in our text implies
this is not a suggestion not to commence; but a command not to continue. Most of us have already started down the
rocky road of criticism, but when we met the Lord, becoming one of His
disciples, we should have stopped. With
too many of us, it has become a habit of thought, almost a bias of the mind. Consider the hurt it
does: homes destroyed; hopes blighted;
hearts broken; churches divided; as well as other harm.
A
cure
There is only one cure. What we have considered up to now may help
with the diagnosis—helping us to understand the seriousness of the malady—but
we must look elsewhere for the remedy. The remedy for criticism is found infallibly in one thing: Love. Spiteful criticism cannot live in the bracing
atmosphere of Christian love. How is
this to be found? Only in one way:
"the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is
given unto us" (
We
are to exercise self-criticism
The Master imparts this in a homely, but
unforgettable way: the parable of the mote and the beam or as an old Christian
carpenter said, “the sawdust and the plank.” Looking
for small faults in others can do great harm. For instance, a little grit in the eye can spoil our vision, affecting
the well-being of our whole body. Some
have suffered serious loss in spiritual experience and service by allowing in
their lives something small, yet potentiality harmful. The point in our text is that some people
constantly look for little motes in others, and are disappointed if they do not
find them. "Why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye?" “The verb in this text signifies staring—to stare at thy brother's fault
as people do while gazing at an object, thereby attracting others to gaze
also" (Dr. J.E. Priest). Unfortunately, there are fault-finders in almost every group of
Christians. How delightfully different
is the atmosphere of 1 Peter 4:8, "And above all things have fervent
charity among yourselves: for charity shall cover the multitude of sins." In other words, love will draw a kindly veil
over faults that rougher hands that are heedless of hurt would drag into the
light.
Blind
to faults of others
The main point in our text is: blindness to self-faults. "The beam that is in thine own
eye." This is where and why
the most searching and rigorous self-criticism is needed. Fault-finders usually have faults of their
own; and curiously enough, the faults they find in others are often the same
found in themselves, greatly magnified—from mote to
beam. They profess to examine the little
faults in the eyes of others, while their own are filled with fault. A blind
guide is bad enough, but a blind oculist is a more ridiculous anomaly. In reality, one cannot have a beam in the
eye. This is language of humorous
hyperbole, calculated to drive the point home. Spurgeon said, "You must tickle the oyster to get the knife
in." From our text, there is no
question that the knife gets in. The
seemingly playful allusion becomes a severe medium of healthy
self-criticism. Is there a beam in our
own eye? Is it a larger specimen of the
same thing we are criticizing in others? Probably, finding faults in others is an attempt to blind our own eyes
(a form of inferiority complex), screening out our own faults from the eyes of
others. Such, by their vehemence and
venom, almost always give themselves away in the end, and are “found out”
because they persist in spiteful fault-finding.
Removing
our faults
But, observe: our text offers a suggestion
of how to remove faults. It must be
attempted carefully and prayerfully; it is a delicate work and the eye is a
precious organ. "First
. . . thine own." If we are going to help others, we must first
help ourselves. Consider the Lord's
words to Peter, "and when thou art converted, strengthen thy
brethren" (Luke 22:32). Fact is,
what makes us Christians is the regeneration of the Holy Spirit: something
eternally abiding yet done once for all. But, although regenerate (“born again”), as Peter undoubtedly was, it is
sadly possible to stray from the path. If we do, our need will then be conversion (“turning back”). This we can do as often as we sin and stray
from the path. First, we are converted
(“turning from sin to Christ”) by faith in the faith of Christ1. The instant we are raised from baptism we are
regenerated. This never needs
repetition. However, if we are not
careful and mindful, we may need to be converted again. Not to be received into the family, but, to
be forgiven by God and restored to the fellowship of the family. This was Peter's situation; only when he was
restored was he in a fit condition to help others. "Then will I teach transgressors thy
ways; and sinners shall be converted unto thee" (Ps. 51:13). This can happen, but only after Psalm 51 has
been granted. "Create . . . renew .
. . cast not . . . take not . . . restore . . . uphold . . . then." The conjunction of Peter's, "when,"
and David's, "then," leads on to our Lord's, "first . . . thine own," in our text.
Helping
our brother
"Then . . . thy
brother's." The
Lord does not discourage us from helping our brother in his fault. But, He does oppose using the wrong
spirit. The real desire to help; the
truly humble spirit that first seeks to right itself—this He encourages. He desires that we take real pains to help
rid our brother of his mote. This is one
of the great objects of self-criticism. Paul points out a further advantage, "For if we would judge
ourselves, we should not be judged" (1 Cor.
11:31). Paul makes it clear that the
Lord's judgment of us, not man's, is the dread alternative to the exercise of
self-criticism. Here is a third feature
of our text:
We
are to employ sensible criticism
Matthew 7:6 is curious. Whatever it teaches, it certainly makes plain
the necessity for a Christian to discriminate between people, discerning
character. Counteracting unholy people
involves a certain reasonable criticism. Keep in mind, when our Lord talks of "dogs" and
"swine," He is referring to unholy men. A child of God must discern their nature and
be able to point them out to others. In
this way, a believer can help reduce their capacity for harm among the flock to
a minimum. To be uncritical in this area
is to be silly, not saintly.
“Dog”
"Dog" is used elsewhere in
Scripture, referring to unholy men: Revelation 22:15, "without are
dogs;" Philippians 3:2, "beware of dogs." In both cases, as in Matthew 7:6, the word
refers to the Eastern pariah dog—scavenger, filthy, savage. It is the word often used by Jews of
Gentiles, "dogs of Gentiles"—certainly not a compliment. It is interesting that when the Lord referred
to "dogs," in Matthew 15:26, He used the diminutive of the former
word, meaning “a little house-dog”—which did indeed "eat of the crumbs
which fall from the master's table."
“Swine”
“Swine” is also used in other Scriptures. An interesting example is 2 Peter 2:22,
"It is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that
was washed to her wallowing in the mire." The dog and swine can do harm in the fold if we do not, by a sensible
criticism, learn an accurate discrimination and, thus, counteract their
influence.
Safeguarding
holy things
A child of God must safeguard holy
things. Portions of certain sacrifices,
holy portions, were reserved for the priests' use. If he met a hungry pariah dog, a priest would
not dream of throwing him "that which is holy." To a dull-witted
savage hog, pearls might seem at first to be acorns, but no one would think of
throwing him a handful. The believer
possesses pearls of truth, holy things indeed, and should be careful to
safeguard them. His gems of deep
spiritual understanding are not for an outspoken unbeliever who would not
appreciate them, as Paul tells us in 1 Corinthians 2:14, "But the natural
man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God:
for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are
spiritually discerned." When the
Lord was before Herod Antipas (Luke 23:9), the king "questioned with him
in many words; but he answered him nothing." Even though earlier (Luke 13:32) the Lord
called him a "fox," here He says nothing. His pearls were not for such as he.
Summary
So, as taught by the Spirit, we must at
times employ a sensible criticism in order to discover true character. Not in a spitefully critical spirit, but in
love, always remembering that love is "the fruit of the Spirit" (Gal.
5:22). Let us strive to eliminate the
unholy habit of censorious judging. The
story is told of three Christian ladies who began criticizing a missionary in
the presence of a spiritually wise Christian brother. They repeatedly told the
missionary that he ought not to do this and that, appealing for the Christian brother’s opinion. He
gave them no answer, but they went on criticizing and insisting on his
opinion. So, he told them, “In
Revelation 12:10b, it is the work of Satan to accuse brethren, and I will not
take sides with him.” What a devastating
rebuke. Such spiritually wise Christian’s
are greatly missed in our age.
Footnote:
1 By understanding Paul’s long sentence in Romans 3:21-26, we understand the
Gospel, all of Romans and the Bible. The 1885 English Revised Version changed
“the faith of Christ” to “faith in Christ” in Romans 3:22; Galatians 2:16,
2:20, 3:22; Ephesians 3:12; and Philippians 3:9. In his book, “Commentaries on
the Old and New Testament,” James Burton Coffman concludes that the KJV is a
correct translation of all these verses, a fact confirmed by the total
agreement of the Emphatic Diaglott in each case.
James Macknight, Adam Clarke, as well as other older
commentators, also agree with the KJV translation of these verses—“the faith of
Christ,” like the “faith of Abraham” in Romans 4:16. We asked a full-time
minister serving a large church, about whether he believed that to be saved one
had to believe in the “faith of Jesus Christ” to which he wrote: “God provides
righteousness to those who believe. If
through the faith of Jesus—everybody would be saved.” We asked the same question to a
university Bible professor, who expressed a view of modern translations held by
many today. He wrote: “Both ideas . . . are biblical . . .” However,
we also presented the question to an elder of the church, who wrote: “The
believer’s faith causes him to respond to that perfect justification which is
and was brought by Christ in His obedience to God’s will of offering His
son as the perfect atonement for all mankind (sins).” We
concur with the elder and older commentators, as well as Coffman, whose
commentary on this verse is a scathing rebuke of many modern-day professors and
preachers. Coffman points out that we should stay with the KJV
in this verse, because changing it represents the same tampering with the Word
of God which resulted in the monstrosity of changing “the righteousness of God”
to “a righteousness” (Rom. 3:21 & Rom. 1:17). He writes: “the true
Scriptural justification by faith has absolutely no reference to the faith of
stinking sinners, but to the faith of the Son of God. The only end served by
this change was to bolster the faith only theory of justification.” He further
writes: “the true grounds of justification cannot ever be in a million years
the faith of fallible, sinful people, would appear to be axiomatic. How could
it be? The very notion that God could impute justification to an evil man,
merely upon the basis of anything that such a foul soul might either believe or
do, is a delusion. Justification in any true sense requires that the justified
be accounted as righteous and undeserving of any penalty whatever; and no man’s
faith is sufficient grounds for such an imputation. On the other hand, the
faith of Jesus Christ is a legitimate ground of justification, because Christ's
faith was perfect.” In the absolute sense, only Christ is faithful—“Faithful is
he that calleth you” (1 Thess.
5:24). Only He is called “the faithful and true witness” (Rev. 3:14). The faith
of Christ was also obedient; a perfect and complete obedience, lacking nothing.
Therefore, we conclude that the sinless, holy, obedient faith of the Son of God
is the only ground of justification of a human being—Christ only is righteously
justified in God’s sight. How then are we saved? We are saved “in Christ,”
having been incorporated into Him—justified as a part of Him. Our study prompts
agreement with Coffman’s conclusion that faith is not the ground of our
justification; it is not the righteousness which makes us righteous before God.
The “faith of the Son of God” is the only basis for our justification, and that
faith is definitely included in the “righteousness of God” mentioned in this
verse. Even the righteousness of
God through faith of Jesus Christ shows the principal constituent of God’s
righteousness. In conclusion, God’s righteousness is the righteousness of Jesus
Christ—His absolute, intrinsic, unalloyed righteousness—implicit in His perfect
faith (mentioned here) and His perfect obedience (implied). The contrary notion
that God’s righteousness is some imputation accomplished by the sinner's faith
is unfounded. Any righteousness that could commend itself to the Father and
become the ground of anything truly worthwhile would, by definition, have to be
a true and genuine righteousness. That righteousness was provided by the
sinless life of the Christ, summarized in this verse as “through faith of Jesus
Christ,” the idea being much clearer in the KJV, “The righteousness of God
which is by faith of Jesus Christ.” We concur with Coffman on this subject,
including his final conclusion, “. . . the word believe in this verse refers to
sinners’ faith (believer’s faith) which is no part of God’s righteousness at
all, but, like baptism, is but a mere condition of salvation—being neither more
nor less important than baptism.”
|