Biblical Essays
GOD'S FULLNESS FOR AN EMPTY VESSEL
(1 Sam. 4 and 7)

The two chapters given above furnish an impressive illustration of a principle that runs throughout the inspired Volume, i.e., that the moment man takes his right place, God can meet him in perfect grace – free, sovereign, unqualified grace: the fullness of God waits on an empty vessel. This principle shines everywhere from Genesis to Revelation. The word “principle” hardly expresses what is meant; it is too cold. We would speak of it as a grand, living, divine fact, that shines with heavenly luster in the Gospel of the grace of God and in the history of God’s people collectively and individually, both in Old and New Testament times.

But man must be in his right place. This is absolutely essential. It is only there he can get a proper view of God. When man as he is, meets God as He is, there is a perfect answer to every question, a divine solution for every difficulty. It is from the standpoint of utter and hopeless ruin that man gets a full, clear, delivering view and sense of God’s salvation. It is when man gets to the end of himself in every shape and form – his bad and good self, his guilty and righteous self – that he begins with a Savior-God. This is true at the starting-post, and true all along the way. The fullness of God always waits on an empty vessel. The great difficulty is to get the vessel empty: when that is done, the whole matter is settled, because the fullness of God can then flow in.

This is a fundamental truth; and in the chapters that stand at the head of this essay we see it in its application to the Lord’s earthly people of old. Let us briefly turn to them.

In the opening of 1 Samuel 4 we find Israel defeated by the Philistines; but instead of humbling themselves before the Lord in true contrition and self-judgment because of their terrible condition, and accepting their defeat as the just judgment of God, there is insensibility and hardness of heart. “And when the people were come into the camp, the elders of Israel said, Wherefore hath the Lord smitten us to-day before the Philistines?” From these words, it is evident that the elders were not in their right place. The word “wherefore” would never have dropped from their lips had they realized their moral condition. They would have known why it was. There was shameful sin in their midst – the vile conduct of Hophni and Phinehas. “Wherefore the sin of the young men was very great before the Lord; for men abhorred the offering of the Lord” (1 Sam. 2:17).

But the people had no sense of their terrible condition, and as a consequence, they had no sense of the remedy. Hence they say, “Let us fetch the ark of the covenant of the Lord out of Shiloh unto us, that, when it cometh among us, it may save us out of the hand of our enemies.” What a delusion; what blindness. There is no self-judgment, no confession of the dishonor done to the name and worship of the God of Israel, no looking to Jehovah in true brokenness and contrition of heart. No; there is the vain notion that the ark would save them from the hand of their enemies. “So the people sent to Shiloh, that they might bring from thence the ark of the covenant of the Lord of hosts, which dwelleth between the cherubim: and the two sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, were there with the ark of the covenant of God.”

What a fearful condition of things. The ark of God associated with those ungodly men whose wickedness was about to bring down the just judgment of a holy and righteous God upon the whole nation. Nothing can be more dreadful, nothing more offensive to God, than the daring attempt to connect His name, His truth, with wickedness. Under any circumstances, moral evil is bad enough; but the attempt to combine moral evil with the name and service of Him who is holy and true, is the highest and darkest form of wickedness and can only bring down the heavy judgment of God. Those ungodly priests, the sons of Eli, had dared to defile the very precincts of the sanctuary with their abominations; and yet these were the men who accompanied the ark of God into the field of battle.

What blindness and hardness of heart. That one sentence, “Hophni and Phinehas were there with the ark of the covenant of God,” embodies in its brief compass the terrible reflection of Israel’s moral condition.

“And when the ark of the covenant of the Lord came into the camp, all Israel shouted with a great shout, so that the earth rang again.” How vain the shout; how hollow the boast; how empty the pretension. It was followed, as is usually the case, by humiliating defeat. “The Philistines fought, and Israel was smitten, and they fled every man into his tent: and there was a very great slaughter; for there fell of Israel thirty thousand footmen. And the ark of God was taken, and the two sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, were slain.”

What a condition of things. The priests slain; the ark taken; the glory departed. The ark in which they boasted and on which they confidently built their hope of victory was actually in the hands of the uncircumcised Philistines. All was gone. That one terrible fact, i.e., the ark of God in the house of Dagon, told the tale of Israel’s complete failure and ruin. God must have reality, truth and holiness in those with whom He deigns to dwell. “Holiness becometh Thy house, O Lord, forever.” To have Jehovah dwelling in their midst was a privilege of the highest order; but it demanded holiness. He could not connect His name with unjudged sin. Such was impossible. It would be a denial of His nature, and God cannot deny Himself. He must have the place where He dwells suited to His nature and character. “Be ye holy, for I am holy.” This is a grand, fundamental truth, which must be tenaciously held and reverently confessed. It must never be surrendered.

But let us briefly glance at the history of the ark in the land of the Philistines. It is both solemn and instructive. Israel had signally failed and shamefully sinned. They had proved themselves wholly unworthy of the ark of the covenant of the Lord; and the Philistines had laid their uncircumcised hands upon it, and actually presumed to bring it into the house of their false god, as if the Lord God of Israel and Dagon could be in the same house. What blasphemous presumption. But the glory which had departed from Israel was vindicated in the darkness and solitude of the temple of Dagon.

God will be God, however His people may fail. Hence we see that when Israel had failed to guard the ark of His testimony, allowing it to pass into the hands of the Philistines, when all was lost in man’s hand, then the glory of God shone out in power and splendor: Dagon fell, and the whole land of the Philistines was made to tremble beneath the hand of Jehovah. His presence was intolerable to them, and they sought to get rid of it as soon as possible. It proved beyond question to be utterly impossible that Jehovah and the uncircumcised could dwell together. Thus it was, thus it is, and thus it always must be. “What concord hath Christ with Belial? . . . And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols?” None whatsoever.

We now turn briefly to 1 Samuel 7. Here we find another condition of things. Here we find something of the empty vessel, and, as is always the case, the fullness of God waiting on it. “And it came to pass, while the ark abode in Kirjath-jearim, that the time was long; for it was twenty years: and all the house of Israel lamented after the Lord.” In 1 Samuel 5 and 6 we see that the Philistines could not do with Jehovah. In 1 Samuel 7 we see that Israel could not do without Him. This is striking and instructive. The world cannot endure the thought of the presence of God. We see this from the very moment of the fall (Gen. 3). Man fled away from God before God drove him out of Eden. He could not endure the divine presence. “I heard Thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.”

Thus, from that moment to the present, it has always been so. No doubt, if we could put an unconverted man into Heaven, he would want out as soon as possible. It is a telling fact that stamps from the whole human race, and accounts for the depth of moral pravity into which the race may sink. If man cannot endure the presence of God, for what place is he fit, and what is he capable of? These are weighty and solemn questions.

But “all the house of Israel lamented after the Lord.” Twenty long, dreary years had rolled by without the blessed sense of His presence; “And Samuel spake unto all the house of Israel, saying, If ye do return unto the Lord with all your hearts, then put away the strange gods, and Ashtaroth, from among you, and prepare your hearts unto the Lord, and serve Him only, and He [not the ark] will deliver you out of the hand of the Philistines. Then the children of Israel did put away Baalim and Ashtaroth, and served the Lord only. And Samuel said, Gather all Israel to Mizpeh, and I will pray for you unto the Lord. And they gathered together to Mizpeh, and drew water, and poured it out before the Lord, and fasted on that day, and said there, We have sinned against the Lord” (1 Sam. 7:2-6; emphasis added).

Here we have a totally different condition of things from that presented in 1 Samuel 4. Here we see the empty vessel getting ready to receive the fullness of God. There is no hollow assumption, no looking to an outward form for salvation. Here, all is reality, all heart-work. Instead of the boastful shout, there is the out-poured water; the striking and expressive symbol of weakness and good-for-nothingness. In other words, man is taking his right place; and as we know, that is the sure precursor of God taking His place. This great principle runs like a golden line throughout the divine Volume, throughout the history of God’s people, throughout the history of souls. It is wrapped up in that brief but comprehensive clause, “Repentance and remission of sins.” Repentance is man’s true place. Remission of sins is God’s response. The former is the empty vessel; the latter, the fullness of God. When these meet, all is settled.

This is strikingly presented in the scene now before us. Having taken their true place, God is free to act on Israel’s behalf. They had confessed themselves to be as water poured on the ground – helpless and worthless. This was all they had to say for themselves, and this was enough. God can now enter the scene and make short work with the Philistines. “If God be for us, who can be against us?” “And Samuel took a sucking lamb, and offered it for a burnt offering wholly unto the Lord: and Samuel cried unto the Lord for Israel; and the Lord heard him. And as Samuel was offering up the burnt offering, the Philistines drew near to battle against Israel [How little they knew whom they were coming against, or who was about to meet them]. But the Lord thundered with a great thunder on that day upon the Philistines, and discomfited them; and they were smitten before Israel . . . Then Samuel took a stone, and set it between Mizpeh and Shen, and called the name of it Eben-ezer [the stone of help], saying, Hitherto hath the Lord helped us” (emphasis added).

What a contrast between Israel’s boastful shout in 1 Samuel 4 and Jehovah’s thunder in 1 Samuel 7. The former was human pretension; the latter, divine power. That was instantly followed by humiliating defeat; this, by splendid triumph. The Philistines knew nothing of what had taken place – the water poured out, the penitential cry, the offering up of the lamb, the priestly intercession. What could uncircumcised Philistines know about these precious realities? They knew nothing whatsoever. When the earth rang with Israel’s pretentious shout, they could take cognizance of that. The men of the world can understand and appreciate self-assertion and self-confidence; but these are the very things that shut out God. On the other hand, His delights are a broken heart, a contrite spirit, and a lowly mind. When Israel took the low place, the place of self-judgment and confession, then Jehovah's thunder was heard, and the host of the Philistines was scattered and confounded. The fullness of God always waits on an empty vessel. What a blessed, precious truth. May we enter more fully into its depth, fullness, power, and scope.

Before closing this brief essay, we observe that 1 Samuel 4 and 7 remind us of the churches of Laodicea and Philadelphia in Revelation 3. The former presents to us a condition we should sedulously avoid; the latter, a condition we should diligently and earnestly cultivate. In the former, we see miserable self-complacency and Christ left outside. In the latter, we see conscious weakness and nothingness but Christ exalted, loved, and honored; His Word kept, and His Name prized.

In Philadelphia, we have that condition of soul and attitude of heart which every true believer and every assembly of Christians should diligently cultivate and faithfully exhibit. On the contrary, Laodicea presents a condition of soul and attitude of heart from which we should shrink with godly fear. Philadelphia is as grateful as Laodicea is loathsome to the heart of Christ. The former, He will make a pillar in the temple of His God; the latter, He will spew out of His mouth, and Satan will take it up and make it a cage of every unclean and hateful bird – Babylon; an awful consideration for all whom it may concern. And let us never forget that pretending to be Philadelphia is the spirit of Laodicea. Wherever we find pretension, assumption, self-assertion or self-complacency, there in spirit and principle we have Laodicea – from which we pray the Lord may deliver us.

Let us be content to be nothing and nobody in this scene of self-exaltation. Let it be our aim to walk in the shade, as far as human thoughts are concerned, yet never be out of the sunshine of our Father’s countenance. In other words, let us always bear in mind that “the fullness of God ever waits on an empty vessel.”


    
Copyright © StudyJesus.com